Friday, February 3, 2017

Genetic Engineering

Genetic Engineering


Genetic engineering is a scientific revolution that changed the way we grow and consume foods in agriculture.  The development of this biotechnology started with the Recombinant-DNA (rDNA) technology, which is the introduction of one organism artificially introduced into the genome of another organism and then replicated and expressed by that other organism[1].  This was created through the collaboration of two scientists Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen in 1972 and after from the original gene-splicing experiment first introduced by Paul Berg in 1971. 
Approximately forty-three years later, most agriculture is cultivated by implementing the scientific method of genetically modified organisms (GMO’s) that had once allowed farmers to grow pest-resilient crops that can grow much larger and sustain a longer shelf life than years prior to the use of this technology. 
In 1999, over 100 million acres of farms around the world were farmed with these genetically engineered seeds. However, by 2003, it was discovered that certain pests had already become immune to the genetically engineered toxins produced by these modified crops.[2]  Further, the need to introduce a stringent form of toxic bacterium in order for these crops to survive is now under way. 
It is important to note that in 2011, the same toxins were found in the blood of a pregnant women who showed evidence that she had passed the same toxin to her unborn child.  Since both humans and animals are being fed genetically engineered crops, it is likely that we are consuming a significant amount of GMO’s from the animals we feed on and the vegetables we eat, quite possibly enhancing the number of toxins we consume from GM foods in our diets per day. 
With the height of the population growing at an astounding rate, projected to grow to 9 million people by 2050[3], the need to cultivate genetically modified food sources will continue to advance in many other facets of our daily diets.  And although there have been numerous accounts of animal cases that have documented severe, if not fatal side-effects to GM food consumption[4].  The FDA continues to allow these GM foods to be produced and has recently approved a recent application from AquaBounty Technologies for AquAdvantage Salmon[5]; this will be a new form of genetically engineered food source that alters the DNA of Atlantic Salmon which will allow it to grow faster, thereby yielding the company a high profit margin on the length of time it takes to raise and sell these genetically modified salmon in the marketplace.  
Which brings me to ask this question: “Is the FDA really looking out for your best interest?”  If you google this very question or “Is the FDA Corrupt?”  You will find many articles and documented regarding this very topic.   But I will leave that up to you to decide for yourselves. 

2 comments:

  1. I LOVE how you chose this topic, because it is so important. This is food we're talking about: the substances we put into our body to survive and nourish ourselves. If they are all chemically treated, are we harming our bodies more than we are helping them? Well, there's been a lot of disagreement within the scientific community about whether or not GMOs are safe to humans.

    Here's the Non-GMO website (which obviously promotes food items that are not genetically modified): http://livingnongmo.org/learn/gmo-faq/?gclid=CjwKEAiAlNbEBRCv9uy4j4SWrgwSJAB5MqJFMYP-wMtzyUAcYccE74qZiKImvme4TtpNKwh-tkGcBBoCa4Hw_wcB#are-gmos-safe

    And here is another article that totally debunks all of the bad claims made against GMOs: http://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/mark-lynas/gmo-safety-debate-over

    Who do we believe? What do we trust? I personally strive to eat mainly organic food (despite the rising cost, which can be disheartening...) simply because I feel GMOs are unnecessary. I want to eat the purest, most simple foods I can find. I truly believe that human beings are not meant to consume chemicals or genetically modified foods to the degree we are, but science disagrees heavily on the outcome of doing so.

    I personally think the FDA is absolutely corrupt. Here is an article concerning drugs and the FDA: http://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/risky-drugs-why-fda-cannot-be-trusted
    And that's just one branch of their job. Food is the other. And in my opinion, if there has been this much disagreement about GMOs, why not just ban them? If there's this much risk associated with GMOs, why not rid them from out diets altogether? We know we do not need them, and by banning them, organic and local farming will take off and we can support local business. Win-win.

    ReplyDelete